开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

必过1030_ · 2019年03月31日

问一道题:NO.PZ201604030100004404 第4小题

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

问题如下图:

    

选项:

A.

B.

C.

解释:


老师,c选项错在哪里呢

1 个答案

包包_品职助教 · 2019年04月01日

同学你好,这道题问V同学最不违反那一条。C同学在推荐股票之前是做了合理的分析的,红色画线部分:

所以他没有违反deligence和reasonable basis.所以答案选C。

粉红豹 · 2019年04月20日

老师,仅仅根据local newspaper的文章和自己对于产品的体验就下结论,能算得上是审慎研究deligence吗??

包包_品职助教 · 2019年04月20日

其实这个地方他就算不是审慎的研究也无所谓,因为他的妹妹都不是她的客户。他这个地方最味违反的就是对雇主的忠诚。因为他们公司明文规定了不能自己买也不能让其他人买公司目标收购公司的股票。

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 392

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201604030100004404 问题如下 4. When recommenng the purchase of aitionGreenhornfoocompany shares, Voser least likely violates the Stanrrelating to: A.loyalty to employer. B.integrity of capitmarkets. C.ligenanreasonable basis. C is correct.Voser least likely violatethe Stanrrelating to ligenanreasonable basis. Voser initially appliethe mosaic theory anha reasonable basis for the tra requireStanrV(A). Eventually, she came into possession of materinonpublic information (corporate logo on a cument, overhearconversation). Accorng to StanrII(A), onin possession of materinonpublic information, she is prohibitefrom acting or causing others to act. Voser also violateher ty of loyalty to her employer, StanrIV(A), encouraging others to tra in Greenhornfooanpossibly harming Crawfoos attempts to acquire the smaller company attractive price. 老师,请教下1、重大非公开信息有一点事信息来源可靠,Voser看到老板办公桌上有一个文件上面有Green公司logo,听到别人说公司名字,但题目没有说他看到文件内容或听到对话内容,这个是不是有点不可靠呀?这纯粹啥实质性信息也没听见,全靠自己联想呀。这个不可靠的信息+之前看新闻得到的公开信息,是不是更像马赛克理论呢?2、麻烦老师讲解下,什么情况就能算信息来源可靠了呢?我记得经典题讲到过一个案例,是一个人看到两个公司高管吃饭,结合一些公开信息,推断出两家公司合并,这个就属于是马赛克理论,是不违反道德的。

2024-08-24 21:32 1 · 回答

integrity of capitmarkets. ligenanreasonable basis. C is correct. Voser least likely violatethe Stanrrelating to ligenanreasonable basis. Voser initially appliethe mosaic theory anha reasonable basis for the tra requireStanrV(A). Eventually, she came into possession of materinonpublic information (corporate logo on a cument, overhearconversation). Accorng to StanrII(A), onin possession of materinonpublic information, she is prohibitefrom acting or causing others to act. Voser also violateher ty of loyalty to her employer, StanrIV(A), encouraging others to tra in Greenhornfooanpossibly harming Crawfoos attempts to acquire the smaller company attractive price. 他的妹妹都不是他的client吧,只是这个分析师看到这个股票好,所以两次推荐给了他妹妹加仓,所以不管怎样他都不违反ligence&reasonable?

2020-11-29 18:05 2 · 回答

integrity of capitmarkets. ligenanreasonable basis. C is correct. Voser least likely violatethe Stanrrelating to ligenanreasonable basis. Voser initially appliethe mosaic theory anha reasonable basis for the tra requireStanrV(A). Eventually, she came into possession of materinonpublic information (corporate logo on a cument, overhearconversation). Accorng to StanrII(A), onin possession of materinonpublic information, she is prohibitefrom acting or causing others to act. Voser also violateher ty of loyalty to her employer, StanrIV(A), encouraging others to tra in Greenhornfooanpossibly harming Crawfoos attempts to acquire the smaller company attractive price. 我就想知道B是为什么

2020-11-13 22:56 1 · 回答

    这道题不是因为 Voser得到了MNI from    supervisor所以才建议 加投的吗?她也没有做reasonable  research呀?

2019-05-01 02:46 1 · 回答