开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

130****6380 · 2025年06月21日

不懂这道题怎么选

NO.PZ2024010506000009

问题如下:

A portfolio has equal holdings of the following investments:

According to PRI’s guide ESG Engagement for Fixed Income Investors, which investment is most likely to be the highest priority for engagement?

选项:

A.Bond 1

B.Bond 2

C.Bond 3

解释:

A is correct. The guide recommends prioritizing engagement with issuers with weak ESG scores and lower credit quality. Bond 1 has the lowest credit score and, along with Bond 3, the lowest ESG score. Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritized because there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower credit quality are prioritized because they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts.

完全不理解。。。。。

0 个答案
  • 0

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 1

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2024010506000009 问题如下 A portfolio hequholngs of the following investments:Accorng to PRI’s gui ESG Engagement for FixeIncome Investors, whiinvestment is most likely to the highest priority for engagement? A.Bon1 B.Bon2 C.Bon3 A is correct. The gui recommen prioritizing engagement with issuers with weESG scores anlower cret quality. Bon1 hthe lowest cret score an along with Bon3, the lowest ESG score. Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritizebecause there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower cret quality are prioritizebecause they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts. 这部分内容在出处在哪里The gui recommen prioritizing engagement with issuers with weESG scores anlower cret quality.

2024-09-26 22:40 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2024010506000009 问题如下 A portfolio hequholngs of the following investments:Accorng to PRI’s gui ESG Engagement for FixeIncome Investors, whiinvestment is most likely to the highest priority for engagement? A.Bon1 B.Bon2 C.Bon3 A is correct. The gui recommen prioritizing engagement with issuers with weESG scores anlower cret quality. Bon1 hthe lowest cret score an along with Bon3, the lowest ESG score. Issuers with low ESG scores are prioritizebecause there is greater scope for improvement; those with lower cret quality are prioritizebecause they are less able to absorb negative ESG impacts. 虽然答案解答中说评分低的有greater scope for improvement,但这个结束就很不符合逻辑?那做投资选择的时候难道就都选择评分低的资产?因为提升空间大?

2024-07-15 08:27 1 · 回答