开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

mino酱是个小破货 · 2025年06月11日

烦请问下老师这么回答可以吗?谢谢老师

NO.PZ2023032703000048

问题如下:

Camille Blanc is a fixed income manager who recently started the Optima mutual fund. The fund is invested in a diversified portfolio of government and corporate bonds. The fund’s mandate requires the effective duration of its portfolio to match that of its benchmark. Blanc’s objective is to outperform a fixed-income benchmark by using an enhanced-indexing strategy.

Blanc evaluates the price sensitivities of Optima relative to its benchmark for changes in the yield curve using scenario analysis:

Scenario 1: She simulates an immediate 10 basis point (bps) parallel shift in the yield curve and finds no difference in the price sensitivities between Optima and its benchmark.

Scenario 2: She simulates an immediate 30 bps change in the 5-year spot rate and holds all other rates constant. She finds a 19 bps difference in the price sensitivities between Optima and its benchmark.

A. Determine whether Optima most likely violates its mandate under each of the following:

i. Scenario 1

ii. Scenario 2

Justify your response for each scenario. (2015 Q3)

Note: Consider each scenario independently.

选项:

解释:

Effective duration measures the sensitivity of a portfolio’s price to a small parallel shift in the yield curve (interest rate risk). For a larger parallel shift, a convexity adjustment is used to improve the accuracy of the estimated price change. Key rate duration captures non-parallel shifts (yield curve risk) such as a steepening in slope or a twist in the yield curve. It measures the effect of changes at key points along the yield curve.

i. Optima does not violate its mandate in Scenario 1. Optima and its benchmark exhibit the same price sensitivity to a small parallel shift in the yield curve because Optima is matched on effective duration.

ii. Optima does not violate its mandate in Scenario 2. Optima and its benchmark exhibit different price sensitivities to a non-parallel shift in the yield curve, indicating that Optima is not matched on key rate duration at the 5-year spot rate. However, its mandate does not require that it be matched on key rate duration.

i. Optima does not violate its mandate in Scenario 1. Optima is matched on effective duration, so it can immunize well on parallel shift.

ii. Optima does not violate its mandate in Scenario 2. 

Optima and its benchmark exhibit different price sensitivities to a non-parallel shift in the yield curve. Since it only require to match effective duration, so it's fine to exist structural risk.

1 个答案

发亮_品职助教 · 2025年06月12日

Optima and its benchmark exhibit different price sensitivities to a non-parallel shift in the yield curve. Since it only require to match effective duration, so it's fine to exist structural risk.


这个回复可以。但是要注意,这道题问2个情景是否违反了mandate,这两个情景都要回复。

因为Mandate是要求资产的effective duration与benchmark的相match。effective duration只是平行移动的指标,所以只能在平行移动时,资产与benchmark的变动一致。

就是match住了ED,如果发生非平行,组合的表现照样会有差异。


scenario 1说:利率平行移动10bps,发现组合和Benchmark的价格变动一致。

这其实恰好说明,组合的effective duration与benchmark是match住的,否则两者的价格改变不可能在平行移动时一致。所以scenario 1的发生证明了组合是match住了Benchmark的effective duration,没有违反mandate。


回复是:

Optima does not violate its mandate in Scenario 1.

In scenario 1, Optima and its benchmark have the same price sensitivity to a small parallel shift in the yield curve, which proves Optima is matched on effective duration.


scenario 2说:利率发生非平行移动,组合和Benchmark的表现不一致。

这个不能证明违反Mandate。因为mandate是要求match effective duration,而effective duration是平行移动的指标,就算match住了effective duration,在利率发生非平行移动时,依然有可能组合的表现有差异。


Optima does not violate its mandate in Scenario 2.

Effective duration measures price sensitivity to small parrallell yield shifts. Even though the effecive duration is matched between optima and benchmark, the two portfolio would still exhibit different price sensitivities to a non-parallel shift as shown in scenario 2. This would not prove that optima violate the mandate.

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 3

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2023032703000048 问题如下 Camille Blanc is a fixeincome manager who recently startethe Optima mutufun The funis investein a versifieportfolio of government ancorporate bon. The funs mante requires the effective ration of its portfolio to matthof its benchmark. Blanc’s objective is to outperform a fixeincome benchmark using enhanceinxing strategy.Blanc evaluates the prisensitivities of Optima relative to its benchmark for changes in the yielcurve using scenario analysis:Scenario 1: She simulates immeate 10 basis point (bps) parallel shift in the yielcurve anfin no fferenin the prisensitivities between Optima anits benchmark.Scenario 2: She simulates immeate 30 bps change in the 5-yespot rate anhol all other rates constant. She fin a 19 bps fferenin the prisensitivities between Optima anits benchmark.termine whether Optima most likely violates its mante unr eaof the following:i. Scenario 1ii. Scenario 2Justify your response for eascenario. (2015 Q3)Note: Consir eascenario inpenntly. Effective ration measures the sensitivity of a portfolio’s prito a small parallel shift in the yielcurve (interest rate risk). For a larger parallel shift, a convexity austment is useto improve the accuraof the estimateprichange. Key rate ration captures non-parallel shifts (yielcurve risk) sua steepening in slope or a twist in the yielcurve. It measures the effeof changes key points along the yielcurve.i. Optima es not violate its mante in Scenario 1. Optima anits benchmark exhibit the same prisensitivity to a small parallel shift in the yielcurve because Optima is matcheon effective ration.ii. Optima es not violate its mante in Scenario 2. Optima anits benchmark exhibit fferent prisensitivities to a non-parallel shift in the yielcurve, incating thOptima is not matcheon key rate ration the 5-yespot rate. However, its mante es not require thit matcheon key rate ration. The funs mante requires the effective ration of its portfolio to matthof its benchmark. Blanc’s objective is to outperform a fixeincome benchmark using enhanceinxing strategy.Scenario 1 not violates the mante because after the immeate 10 basis point (bps) parallel shift in the yielcurve, there is no fferenin the prisensitivities between Optima anits benchmark.Scenario 2 not violates the mante because even though immeate 30 bps change in the 5-yespot rate triggerethe 19 bps fferenin the prisensitivities between Optima anits benchmark, effective ration is only for the parallel shift of the yielcurve.In conclusion, Optima not violates its mante.

2025-04-09 18:46 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2023032703000048 问题如下 Camille Blanc is a fixeincome manager who recently startethe Optima mutufun The funis investein a versifieportfolio of government ancorporate bon. The funs mante requires the effective ration of its portfolio to matthof its benchmark. Blanc’s objective is to outperform a fixeincome benchmark using enhanceinxing strategy.Blanc evaluates the prisensitivities of Optima relative to its benchmark for changes in the yielcurve using scenario analysis:Scenario 1: She simulates immeate 10 basis point (bps) parallel shift in the yielcurve anfin no fferenin the prisensitivities between Optima anits benchmark.Scenario 2: She simulates immeate 30 bps change in the 5-yespot rate anhol all other rates constant. She fin a 19 bps fferenin the prisensitivities between Optima anits benchmark.termine whether Optima most likely violates its mante unr eaof the following:i. Scenario 1ii. Scenario 2Justify your response for eascenario. (2015 Q3)Note: Consir eascenario inpenntly. Effective ration measures the sensitivity of a portfolio’s prito a small parallel shift in the yielcurve (interest rate risk). For a larger parallel shift, a convexity austment is useto improve the accuraof the estimateprichange. Key rate ration captures non-parallel shifts (yielcurve risk) sua steepening in slope or a twist in the yielcurve. It measures the effeof changes key points along the yielcurve.i. Optima es not violate its mante in Scenario 1. Optima anits benchmark exhibit the same prisensitivity to a small parallel shift in the yielcurve because Optima is matcheon effective ration.ii. Optima es not violate its mante in Scenario 2. Optima anits benchmark exhibit fferent prisensitivities to a non-parallel shift in the yielcurve, incating thOptima is not matcheon key rate ration the 5-yespot rate. However, its mante es not require thit matcheon key rate ration. effective ration衡量parallel shiftKR量non-parallel shift请问empiricration可以衡量non-parallel shift吗?spreration衡量的是sprecurve的parallel shift还是也可以衡量non-parallel shift?

2024-07-21 13:42 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2023032703000048 问题如下 Camille Blanc is a fixeincome manager who recently startethe Optima mutufun The funis investein a versifieportfolio of government ancorporate bon. The funs mante requires the effective ration of its portfolio to matthof its benchmark. Blanc’s objective is to outperform a fixeincome benchmark using enhanceinxing strategy.Blanc evaluates the prisensitivities of Optima relative to its benchmark for changes in the yielcurve using scenario analysis:Scenario 1: She simulates immeate 10 basis point (bps) parallel shift in the yielcurve anfin no fferenin the prisensitivities between Optima anits benchmark.Scenario 2: She simulates immeate 30 bps change in the 5-yespot rate anhol all other rates constant. She fin a 19 bps fferenin the prisensitivities between Optima anits benchmark.termine whether Optima most likely violates its mante unr eaof the following:i. Scenario 1ii. Scenario 2Justify your response for eascenario. (2015 Q3)Note: Consir eascenario inpenntly. Effective ration measures the sensitivity of a portfolio’s prito a small parallel shift in the yielcurve (interest rate risk). For a larger parallel shift, a convexity austment is useto improve the accuraof the estimateprichange. Key rate ration captures non-parallel shifts (yielcurve risk) sua steepening in slope or a twist in the yielcurve. It measures the effeof changes key points along the yielcurve.i. Optima es not violate its mante in Scenario 1. Optima anits benchmark exhibit the same prisensitivity to a small parallel shift in the yielcurve because Optima is matcheon effective ration.ii. Optima es not violate its mante in Scenario 2. Optima anits benchmark exhibit fferent prisensitivities to a non-parallel shift in the yielcurve, incating thOptima is not matcheon key rate ration the 5-yespot rate. However, its mante es not require thit matcheon key rate ration. 老师好,effective ration是等于key rate ration之和吧?场景2暗示的应该是其中一个key rate ration变化了,但是没有给其他key point的情况,应该无法严谨的判断出场景2没有违反effective ration match的mante?

2024-07-20 14:01 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2023032703000048 问题如下 Camille Blanc is a fixeincome manager who recently startethe Optima mutufun The funis investein a versifieportfolio of government ancorporate bon. The funs mante requires the effective ration of its portfolio to matthof its benchmark. Blanc’s objective is to outperform a fixeincome benchmark using enhanceinxing strategy.Blanc evaluates the prisensitivities of Optima relative to its benchmark for changes in the yielcurve using scenario analysis:Scenario 1: She simulates immeate 10 basis point (bps) parallel shift in the yielcurve anfin no fferenin the prisensitivities between Optima anits benchmark.Scenario 2: She simulates immeate 30 bps change in the 5-yespot rate anhol all other rates constant. She fin a 19 bps fferenin the prisensitivities between Optima anits benchmark.termine whether Optima most likely violates its mante unr eaof the following:i. Scenario 1ii. Scenario 2Justify your response for eascenario. (2015 Q3)Note: Consir eascenario inpenntly. Effective ration measures the sensitivity of a portfolio’s prito a small parallel shift in the yielcurve (interest rate risk). For a larger parallel shift, a convexity austment is useto improve the accuraof the estimateprichange. Key rate ration captures non-parallel shifts (yielcurve risk) sua steepening in slope or a twist in the yielcurve. It measures the effeof changes key points along the yielcurve.i. Optima es not violate its mante in Scenario 1. Optima anits benchmark exhibit the same prisensitivity to a small parallel shift in the yielcurve because Optima is matcheon effective ration.ii. Optima es not violate its mante in Scenario 2. Optima anits benchmark exhibit fferent prisensitivities to a non-parallel shift in the yielcurve, incating thOptima is not matcheon key rate ration the 5-yespot rate. However, its mante es not require thit matcheon key rate ration. 你好,这道题为啥用effective ration来衡量ration matching??

2024-02-05 10:29 1 · 回答