NO.PZ2024082801000068
问题如下:
Andrew Omandi Case Scenario
Andrew Omandi works as a senior analyst at investment firm CPSR Partners. He and junior analysts, Emmanuel Katangole, Takasongo Kasongo and Peter Mensah, have been tasked with investigating the use of multi factor models to help explain portfolio returns. After conducting some research, they identify a three-factor model described below, and are meeting to finalize their presentation to the firm's investment committee.
Rit - Rft = interceptit + BM(RMt-Rft) + BSMB(SMBt) + BHML(HMLt) + eit
Where:
Rit = portfolio return
Rft = risk free rate, one-month T-bill return
BM = market regression coefficient
RMt = return on market portfolio
RMt-Rft = market risk premium
BSMB = SMB regression coefficient
SMBt = return difference between small cap stocks and large cap stocks (size premium)
BHML = HML regression coefficient
HMLt = return difference between high book to market stocks and low book to market stocks (value premium)
eit = error term
Omandi states: "This model indicates that the main factors driving expected portfolio excess returns are premiums for market risk (RMt-Rft), size (SMBt) and value (HMLt). I also believe that there is a positive relationship between portfolio excess return and each of the independent variables, market risk, size and value premiums. Based on this we can formulate the following hypotheses:
Hypothesis 1
Ho: BM = 0
Ha: BM ≠ 0
Hypothesis 2
Ho: BSMB ≤ 0
Ha: BSMB > 0
Hypothesis 3
Ho: BHML > 0
Ha: BHML ≤ 0"
The analysts test the model and the regression results of excess portfolio returns on Mkt-Rf, SMB and HML are presented below in Exhibit 1.
Exhibit 1:
Kasango states that it is important to emphasize that the multiple linear regression model makes a number of assumptions, three of which are:
- Assumption 1: The regression residuals are normally distributed
- Assumption 2: The variance of the regression residuals is the same for all observations.
- Assumption 3: The regression residuals are correlated across observations.
Katangole asks how one can assess the goodness of fit of the estimated regression to the data. Mensah responds, "One measure, the R2 can be defined as the ratio of the variation in the dependent variable explained by the independent variables to the total variation of the dependent variable. However, e R2 stays the same or increases when independent variables are added to the regression. A better measure is the adjusted R2 which does not automatically increase when independent variables are added to the regression."
Is Mensah's response to Katangole about the goodness of fit of the estimated regression to the data most likely correct?
选项:
A.A.Yes B.B.No, he is incorrect about R2 C.C.No, he is incorrect about adjusted R2解释:
A is Correct. In his response to Katangole, Mensah is correct about multiple R2 and adjusted R2. The R2 provides an indication of how much of the variation in the dependent variable, excess portfolio returns, is explained by the independent variables, RMt-Rft, SMBt and HMLt. The multiple R2 here is 0.6235, so there is a possibility that they may have omitted independent variables from the equation. Also, However, in a multiple linear regression R2 can be increased simply by adding independent variables - it may stay the same but will never decrease with added variables., and this happens when the new independent variable is not a linear combination of the other independent variables and is at least slightly correlated with the dependent variable. The adjusted R2 is a better measure of goodness of fit in a multiple regressions because it does not automatically increase when independent variables are added to the regression.
B is Incorrect as Mensah is correct about multiple R2. The R2 provides an indication of how much of the variation in the dependent variable, excess portfolio returns, is explained by the independent variables, RMt-Rft, SMBt and HMLt. The multiple R2 here is 0.6235, so there is a possibility that they may have omitted independent variables from the equation. Also, However, in a multiple linear regression R2 can be increased simply by adding independent variables, and this happens when the new independent variable is not a linear combination of the other independent variables and is at least slightly correlated with the dependent variable.
C is Incorrect as Mensah is correct about adjusted R2. The adjusted R2 is a better measure of goodness of fit in a multiple regressions because it does not automatically increase when independent variables are added to the regression.
书上写的应该是增加一个变量,R2 会增加,有可能不变吗?