开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

李惜雯💭 · 2024年08月03日

投REITS会降低流动性吗?

NO.PZ2022062601000007

问题如下:

Zhou is a high net worth client. He and his investment advisor Jesse have been investing in publicly traded securities portfolios in the past. Today, they meet to discuss his investment strategy and potential changes in his investment portfolio, especially in his charitable fund, which will add more alternative investments such as private equity, hedge funds, real estate, and the real estate portfolio consists of a well delivered selection of REITs and direct real estate. He told him, Later this year, he wants to shift approximately 50% of the charitable foundation's investment portfolio to alternative investments, leaving the remaining portion in the existing high liquidity asset allocation. This requires managers with experience in alternative investment management, and fortunately, high net worth investors like me have easier access to top-tier managers. I know that shifting the foundation's investment portfolio into alternative investments will greatly reduce the liquidity of these positions, but considering the long-term prospects of the fund, I don’t believe this will be a concern. Investing in these assets definitely requires you to spend more time conducting due diligence, but based on the advisory work you have done for me in the past and your experience, I believe you have the ability to do this."

When discussing with Jesse about shifting foundation portfolio assets into alternative investments, Zhou is most likely correct:

选项:

A.

due diligence.

B.

liquidity issues.

C.

access to managers.

解释:

B is correct. A shift into private equity, hedge funds, direct real estate, and similar investments will reduce the liquidity of investment portfolios, but 50% of charitable foundation investment portfolios will be retained in other more liquid asset classes. The foundation aims to provide ongoing annual grants, so these liquid investments should be sufficient to meet ongoing expenditure needs.

A is incorrect. Indeed, investments in private equity, hedge funds, direct real estate, and similar investments will require extensive due diligence, while investments in REITs do not require these efforts. However, Zhou has no evidence to suggest that Jesse is capable of making such efforts, as his past collaborations with Jesse involved trading and establishing a portfolio of liquid publicly traded securities.

C is incorrect. Indeed, the number of providers of private equity, hedge funds, direct real estate, and similar investments has significantly increased over time; However, access to top-tier managers is quite limited, as managers of alternative investments tend to be capacity constrained and many alternative investment strategies have limited market volume.

知识点考察:Investment Considerations Relevant to the Decision to Invest in Alternatives

B是正确的。转向私募股权、对冲基金、直接房地产和类似投资将减少投资组合的流动性,但慈善基金会50%的投资组合将保留在其他流动性更强的资产类别中。该基金会旨在提供持续的年度赠款,因此这些流动性投资应足以满足持续的支出需求。

A不正确。事实上,对私募股权、对冲基金、直接房地产和类似投资的投资需要广泛的尽职调查,而对REITs的投资则不需要这些努力。然而,周没有证据表明杰西有能力做出这样的努力,因为他过去与杰西的合作涉及交易和建立流动性公开交易证券的投资组合。

C不正确。事实上,随着时间的推移,私人股本、对冲基金、直接房地产和类似投资的提供者数量显著增加;然而,接触顶级管理人员的机会非常有限,因为另类投资的管理人员往往能力有限,许多另类投资策略的市场容量有限。

如题


1 个答案

伯恩_品职助教 · 2024年08月05日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


REITs的流动性还是不错的,是不是会降低流动性,看过去投资的什么,如果是cash,那就是降低,如果是PE、hedge funds, real estate, 这些就不会降低流动性反而提高流动性

----------------------------------------------
就算太阳没有迎着我们而来,我们正在朝着它而去,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 59

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2022062601000007问题如下 Zhou is a high net worth client. He anhis investment aisor Jesse have been investing in publicly trasecurities portfolios in the past. Toy, they meet to scuss his investment strategy anpotentichanges in his investment portfolio, especially in his charitable fun whiwill a more alternative investments suprivate equity, hee fun, reestate, anthe reestate portfolio consists of a well livereselection of REITs anrereestate. He tolhim, Later this year, he wants to shift approximately 50% of the charitable fountion's investment portfolio to alternative investments, leaving the remaining portion in the existing high liquity asset allocation. This requires managers with experienin alternative investment management, anfortunately, high net worth investors like me have easier access to top-tier managers. I know thshifting the fountion's investment portfolio into alternative investments will greatly rethe liquity of these positions, but consiring the long-term prospects of the fun I n’t believe this will a concern. Investing in these assets finitely requires you to spenmore time concting e ligence, but baseon the aisory work you have ne for me in the past anyour experience, I believe you have the ability to this.\"When scussing with Jesse about shifting fountion portfolio assets into alternative investments, Zhou is most likely correct: A.e ligence.B.liquity issues.C.access to managers. B is correct. A shift into private equity, hee fun, rereestate, ansimilinvestments will rethe liquity of investment portfolios, but 50% of charitable fountion investment portfolios will retainein other more liquiasset classes. The fountion aims to provi ongoing annugrants, so these liquiinvestments shoulsufficient to meet ongoing expenture nee.A is incorrect. Ine investments in private equity, hee fun, rereestate, ansimilinvestments will require extensive e ligence, while investments in REITs not require these efforts. However, Zhou hno evinto suggest thJesse is capable of making suefforts, his past collaborations with Jesse involvetrang anestablishing a portfolio of liquipublicly trasecurities.C is incorrect. Ine the number of provirs of private equity, hee fun, rereestate, ansimilinvestments hsignificantly increaseover time; However, access to top-tier managers is quite limite managers of alternative investments tento capacity constraineanmany alternative investment strategies have limitemarket volume. 知识点考察Investment ConsirationsRelevant to the cision to Invest in AlternativesB是正确的。转向私募股权、对冲基金、直接房地产和类似投资将减少投资组合的流动性,但慈善基金会50%的投资组合将保留在其他流动性更强的资产类别中。该基金会旨在提供持续的年度赠款,因此这些流动性投资应足以满足持续的支出需求。A不正确。事实上,对私募股权、对冲基金、直接房地产和类似投资的投资需要广泛的尽职调查,而对REITs的投资则不需要这些努力。然而,周没有证据表明杰西有能力做出这样的努力,因为他过去与杰西的合作涉及交易和建立流动性公开交易证券的投资组合。C不正确。事实上,随着时间的推移,私人股本、对冲基金、直接房地产和类似投资的提供者数量显著增加;然而,接触顶级管理人员的机会非常有限,因为另类投资的管理人员往往能力有限,许多另类投资策略的市场容量有限。 老师 为什么不选c 另外a也没看懂

2024-01-03 21:11 1 · 回答