开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Stella · 2024年06月24日

对于b选项的疑问

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ202207040100000105

问题如下:

Leeter’s reply to Clickman concerning determining the style of funds is most accurate in regard to the:

选项:

A.description of a returns-based analysis. B.applicability of returns-based analysis versus holding-based analysis. C.comparison of depth of analysis between returns-based analysis versus holdings-based analysis.

解释:

Solution

A is correct. Leeter’s reply is correct in regard to the description of returns-based analysis. Regressing a fund’s past returns against the past returns from a number of style indexes is a returns-based style analysis.

B is incorrect. Leeter’s reply is incorrect in regard to the applicability of returns-based analysis versus holdings-based analysis. Returns-based analysis is easier to implement than holdings-based analysis because data are more readily available.

C is incorrect. Leeter’s reply is incorrect in regard to the comparison of depth analysis between the two methods. Holdings-based analysis allows for a deeper level of analysis when compared with returns-based analysis because holdings-based analysis uses the actual portfolio holdings. The analysis is more accurate and generates more information for making style allocation decisions.

return base是比holding base更好获取数据,但是这个地方说return base更容易我不是很理解,毕竟holding只需要有持仓就可用分析了,而return还要做回归分析,相比起来肯定是有底仓更easy吧。。虽然用定义可以选出a

1 个答案
已采纳答案

笛子_品职助教 · 2024年06月25日

嗨,努力学习的PZer你好:


return base是比holding base更好获取数据,但是这个地方说return base更容易我不是很理解,毕竟holding只需要有持仓就可用分析了,而return还要做回归分析,相比起来肯定是有底仓更easy吧。。虽然用定义可以选出a


Hello,亲爱的同学~

return based,只需要拿到fund的收益率数据就可以做分析了。而收益率数据是很容易获取的。

而且收益率数据就是一组时间序列。


而holding based,需要拿到fund的所有持仓数据,有些fund可以有几百个持股。

几百个股票,每一个股票都要做分析,要分析几百次。


CFA里认为,还是return - based更简单一些。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!