开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Pretzel · 2024年05月20日

C不算是escalation吗

NO.PZ2024021801000098

问题如下:

A non-profit organization published a report listing companies with a large plastic footprint. A portfolio manager believes the report will impact the valuation of a portfolio company. According to the Investor Forum, which of the following forms of engagement would be the most effective?

选项:

A.Discussing the report with the company during their annual review dialogue

B.Writing a tailored letter to the company requesting additional details about their plastic footprint

C.Participating in a collective engagement in collaboration with other investors to address the report

解释:

A. Incorrect because the manager's engagement is an example of a housekeeping engagement which is an annual dialogue to help maintain and enhance a relationship with a company, but with only limited objectives. Housekeeping engagement is somewhat likely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factor of SF6: Depth of relationship but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement.

B. Incorrect because tailored letter-writing is somewhat likely to fulfill the Investor Forum success factors of SF1: Clear Objective and SF2: Material and strategic but not likely to meet the other success factors for effective engagement.

C. Correct because a collective engagement is most likely to fulfill all six success factors of effective engagement published by the Investor Forum i.e. SF1 – Objective(s) should be specific and targeted to enable clarity around delivery, SF2 – Objectives should be strategic or governance-led, or linked to material strategic and/or governance issues, SF3 – The engagement approach should be bespoke (tailored) to the target company, SF4 – The participants should have clear leadership with appropriate relationships, skills and knowledge, SF5 – The scale of coalition gathered (both scale of shareholding and overall AUM of group) should be meaningful, SF6 – The coalition should have a prior relationship and/or cultural awareness of the target company.

为什么不能选B?我认为要先B这种温和手段,如果无效,再采用C升级。

1 个答案

Carol文_品职助教 · 2024年05月20日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


你的想法是合理的,通常温和的手段(如写信)可以作为初步的接触方式。然而,在这个特定的情境下,根据Investor Forum的六个成功要素(SF1-SF6),集体行动(选项C)被认为是最有效的形式。这是因为集体行动可以同时满足所有六个成功要素,而单独写信(选项B)可能在一些关键方面存在不足。


让我们详细分析一下,Investor Forum的六个成功要素:

SF1: Clear Objective(明确的目标)

B选项:写信可以设定明确的目标,要求公司提供更多关于塑料足迹的信息。

C选项:集体行动也可以设定明确的目标,并且这些目标可能更有力,因为它们是由多个投资者共同提出的。

SF2: Material and Strategic(重要且战略性的)

B选项:写信可以涉及战略性问题,但可能缺乏整体影响力。

C选项:集体行动通常涉及战略性和重要性问题,并且由于有更多投资者参与,这些问题的重视程度更高。

SF3: Bespoke Approach(定制化的方法)

B选项:写信可以根据公司的具体情况进行定制,但这种方法的影响力有限。

C选项:集体行动可以根据公司的具体情况进行定制,并且由于有多方参与,这种定制化的方法更有深度。

SF4: Clear Leadership(明确的领导)

B选项:单独写信的领导力可能不足,缺乏多方的支持和协调。

C选项:集体行动通常由一群有明确领导的投资者主导,这种领导力更强。

SF5: Meaningful Coalition(有意义的联盟)

B选项:单独写信缺乏联盟的力量,影响力有限。

C选项:集体行动通过形成有意义的投资者联盟,能够对公司施加更大的压力。

SF6: Depth of Relationship(关系的深度)

B选项:单独写信可以建立一些关系,但深度可能不够。

C选项:集体行动通过多个投资者的参与,能够与公司建立更深层次的关系。


总结:虽然写信(B选项)是一种温和的接触方式,并且在某些情况下可以作为初步手段,但在这个情境下,Investor Forum的六个成功要素表明,集体行动(C选项)更有可能全面有效地影响公司。这种方法不仅能设定明确和战略性的目标,而且能通过投资者的联盟施加更大的压力,建立更深的关系,确保行动的领导力和协调性。因此,尽管温和手段是一个合理的开始,但在这个案例中,集体行动被认为是最有效的。

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 140

    浏览
相关问题