开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Katherine · 2024年03月19日

内生的结论是技术进步是可持续的,并且没提到边际效应递减,所以为什么不是新古典呢?

NO.PZ2023041102000040

问题如下:

Pamuk concludes: The impact from these policies will cause a long-term increase in the economy’s growth rate and the standard of living. Furthermore, if we emphasize R&D spending, then higher rates of saving and investment are unlikely to encounter diminishing marginal returns. Pamuk’s conclusion regarding the growth policy debate is most consistent with which model of economic growth?

选项:

A.Endogenous B.Neoclassical C.Classical

解释:

Pamuk’s conclusion is consistent with the endogenous growth model. In the endogenous growth model, the economy does not reach a steady growth rate equal to the growth of labor plus an exogenous rate of labor productivity growth. Instead, saving and investment decisions can generate self-sustaining growth at a permanently higher rate. This situation is in sharp contrast to the neoclassical model, in which only a transitory increase in growth above the steady state is possible. The reason for this difference is because of the externalities on R&D, diminishing marginal returns to capital do not set in.

我因为这句话选的新古典:then higher rates of saving and investment are unlikely to encounter diminishing marginal returns. 意思是高储蓄率和投资并不能解决边际效应递减,我由此推断题目想表达稳态。


相反内生的结论是技术进步是可持续的,并且没提到边际效应递减,所以为什么不是新古典呢?

1 个答案

Katherine · 2024年03月19日

这个题明白啦,是我英文理解错了,谢谢老师

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 153

    浏览
相关问题