开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)｜3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

返回

157****1774 · 2024年03月08日

为啥不选C？

  1. ESG
  2. Governance factors

NO.PZ2022120701000045

问题如下：

The interests of institutional investors are most likely protected through:

选项：

A.pre-emptive rights.

B.related-party transactions.

C.dual-class share structures.

解释：

Pre-emptive rights ensure that investors, including institutional investors, can avoid dilution of their interest in a company by a dominant shareholder seeking to gain more control Both related-party transactions and dual-class share structures are disadvantageous to minority shareholders such as institutional investors, as they can enable dominant shareholders to siphon resources from the company or maintain disproportionate control of voting rights, respectively

讲义里也提到了“dual- class”对机构投资者也是useful的，我的理解是一人有多票的时候也是有利的，但只是早期有利。是这个原因不选C吗？

添加评论
1 个答案

Tina_品职助教 · 2024年03月08日

嗨，爱思考的PZer你好：


dual-class share structures.一般是对公司的创始团队，或实际决定权人有利。

机构投资者就是养老金、主权财富基金、捐赠基金等机构。机构投资者的钱一般不会集中在某几个公司上，分散化投资使得机构投资者在一家公司的股权占有上一般是小股东的身份. 很少会是持有这个具有投票权的股份的。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧，让我们一起遇见更好的自己！

  • 1

    回答

  • 1

    关注

  • 296

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2022120701000045问题如下 The interests of institutioninvestors are most likely protectethrough:A.pre-emptive rights.B.relateparty transactions.C.al-class share structures.Pre-emptive rights ensure thinvestors, inclung institutioninvestors, cavoilution of their interest in a company a minant shareholr seeking to gain more control Both relateparty transactions anal-class share structures are saantageous to minority shareholrs suinstitutioninvestors, they cenable minant shareholrs to siphon resources from the company or maintain sproportionate control of voting rights, respectively​A的pre_emptive不是保护现有小股东的权利？为什么也保护了机构投资者？？？

2024-06-22 14:16 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000045问题如下 The interests of institutioninvestors are most likely protectethrough:A.pre-emptive rights.B.relateparty transactions.C.al-class share structures.Pre-emptive rights ensure thinvestors, inclung institutioninvestors, cavoilution of their interest in a company a minant shareholr seeking to gain more control Both relateparty transactions anal-class share structures are saantageous to minority shareholrs suinstitutioninvestors, they cenable minant shareholrs to siphon resources from the company or maintain sproportionate control of voting rights, respectively有道题，强调这个措施是保护小股东的，为什么也是保护机构投资者。准确的说，应该是保护原始股东的，和大小、机构都没有关系吧，总感觉逻辑有点混乱。求

2024-06-22 11:54 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000045问题如下The interests of institutioninvestors are most likely protectethrough:A.pre-emptive rights.B.relateparty transactions.C.al-class share structures.Pre-emptive rights ensure thinvestors, inclung institutioninvestors, cavoilution of their interest in a company a minant shareholr seeking to gain more control Both relateparty transactions anal-class share structures are saantageous to minority shareholrs suinstitutioninvestors, they cenable minant shareholrs to siphon resources from the company or maintain sproportionate control of voting rights, respectively老师能具体讲讲B的情况吗？以及讲义哪里出现过？

2024-03-17 16:28 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000045问题如下The interests of institutioninvestors are most likely protectethrough:A.pre-emptive rights.B.relateparty transactions.C.al-class share structures.Pre-emptive rights ensure thinvestors, inclung institutioninvestors, cavoilution of their interest in a company a minant shareholr seeking to gain more control Both relateparty transactions anal-class share structures are saantageous to minority shareholrs suinstitutioninvestors, they cenable minant shareholrs to siphon resources from the company or maintain sproportionate control of voting rights, respectivelyA的含义，以及思维导图里有么？

2024-02-28 20:57 1 · 回答