开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

纵火蛙 · 2024年02月28日

A 是什么意思?哪里能看见相关的思维导图?

NO.PZ2022120701000045

问题如下:

The interests of institutional investors are most likely protected through:

选项:

A.pre-emptive rights.

B.related-party transactions.

C.dual-class share structures.

解释:

Pre-emptive rights ensure that investors, including institutional investors, can avoid dilution of their interest in a company by a dominant shareholder seeking to gain more control Both related-party transactions and dual-class share structures are disadvantageous to minority shareholders such as institutional investors, as they can enable dominant shareholders to siphon resources from the company or maintain disproportionate control of voting rights, respectively

A的含义,以及思维导图里有么?

1 个答案

王岑 · 2024年02月29日

嗨,从没放弃的小努力你好:


Pre-emptive rights, 在金融和公司法中,通常指的是现有股东在公司发行新股时,有权优先购买足够的股份,从而能够维持他们在公司中的所有权比例不变。这项权利可以防止股东的持股比例因为新股的发行而被稀释。简单来说,就是如果公司要卖更多的股份给别人,现有的股东有第一优先权买这些新股,以保持他们在公司中的影响力。

我们的思维导图中包含关于保护小股东权益的内容:

思维导图可以在课程资料中下载:

----------------------------------------------
努力的时光都是限量版,加油!

  • 1

    回答
  • 1

    关注
  • 335

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2022120701000045问题如下 The interests of institutioninvestors are most likely protectethrough:A.pre-emptive rights.B.relateparty transactions.C.al-class share structures.Pre-emptive rights ensure thinvestors, inclung institutioninvestors, cavoilution of their interest in a company a minant shareholr seeking to gain more control Both relateparty transactions anal-class share structures are saantageous to minority shareholrs suinstitutioninvestors, they cenable minant shareholrs to siphon resources from the company or maintain sproportionate control of voting rights, respectively​A的pre_emptive不是保护现有小股东的权利?为什么也保护了机构投资者???

2024-06-22 14:16 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000045问题如下 The interests of institutioninvestors are most likely protectethrough:A.pre-emptive rights.B.relateparty transactions.C.al-class share structures.Pre-emptive rights ensure thinvestors, inclung institutioninvestors, cavoilution of their interest in a company a minant shareholr seeking to gain more control Both relateparty transactions anal-class share structures are saantageous to minority shareholrs suinstitutioninvestors, they cenable minant shareholrs to siphon resources from the company or maintain sproportionate control of voting rights, respectively有道题,强调这个措施是保护小股东的,为什么也是保护机构投资者。准确的说,应该是保护原始股东的,和大小、机构都没有关系吧,总感觉逻辑有点混乱。求

2024-06-22 11:54 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000045问题如下The interests of institutioninvestors are most likely protectethrough:A.pre-emptive rights.B.relateparty transactions.C.al-class share structures.Pre-emptive rights ensure thinvestors, inclung institutioninvestors, cavoilution of their interest in a company a minant shareholr seeking to gain more control Both relateparty transactions anal-class share structures are saantageous to minority shareholrs suinstitutioninvestors, they cenable minant shareholrs to siphon resources from the company or maintain sproportionate control of voting rights, respectively老师能具体讲讲B的情况吗?以及讲义哪里出现过?

2024-03-17 16:28 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2022120701000045问题如下The interests of institutioninvestors are most likely protectethrough:A.pre-emptive rights.B.relateparty transactions.C.al-class share structures.Pre-emptive rights ensure thinvestors, inclung institutioninvestors, cavoilution of their interest in a company a minant shareholr seeking to gain more control Both relateparty transactions anal-class share structures are saantageous to minority shareholrs suinstitutioninvestors, they cenable minant shareholrs to siphon resources from the company or maintain sproportionate control of voting rights, respectively讲义里也提到了“al- class”对机构投资者也是useful的,我的理解是一人有多票的时候也是有利的,但只是早期有利。是这个原因不选C吗?

2024-03-08 07:52 1 · 回答