开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

花卷喵 · 2023年08月30日

The asset allocation mix

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201803130100000401

问题如下:

Contrast, using the information provided above, the results of a reverse optimization approach with that of the MVO approach for each of the following:
i. The asset allocation mix. Justify your response.

选项:

解释:

■ The asset allocation weights for the reverse optimization method are inputs into the optimization and are determined by the market capitalization weights of the global market portfolio.

■ The asset allocation weights for the MVO method are outputs of the optimization with the expected returns, covariances, and a risk aversion coefficient used as inputs.

■ The two methods result in significantly different asset allocation mixes.

■ In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization method results in a higher percentage point allocation to global bonds, US bonds, and global equities as well as a lower percentage point allocation to cash and US equities.

The reverse optimization method takes the asset allocation weights as its inputs that are assumed to be optimal. These weights are calculated as the market capitalization weights of a global market portfolio. In contrast, the outputs of an MVO are the asset allocation weights, which are based on (1) expected returns and covariances that are forecasted using historical data and (2) a risk aversion coefficient. The two methods result in significantly different asset allocation mixes. In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization method results in a 4.9, 5.5, and 10.1 higher percentage point allocation to US bonds, global equities, and global bonds, respectively, and a 6.1 and 14.4 lower percentage point allocation to cash and US equities, respectively.
The asset allocation under the two methods is as follows:



这道题在问什么啊?The asset allocation mix是什么意思?

1 个答案

lynn_品职助教 · 2023年08月31日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


1、这条题干需要两句话合在一起看,给你调整一下语序就可以比较清楚了:


 using the information provided above, Contrast (the results of a reverse optimization approach) with (that of the MVO approach) for the asset allocation mix.


翻译过来就是让你比较一下reverse optimization 和 MVO配置权重的差异


2、asset allocation mix是资产配置组合,也就是展示组合中各个资产的权重。

----------------------------------------------
加油吧,让我们一起遇见更好的自己!

  • 1

    回答
  • 0

    关注
  • 452

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ201803130100000401 问题如下 Contrast, using the information proviabove, the results of a reverse optimization approawith thof the MVO approafor eaof the following:i. The asset allocation mix. Justify your response. ■ The asset allocation weights for the reverse optimization methoare inputs into the optimization anare terminethe market capitalization weights of the globmarket portfolio.■ The asset allocation weights for the MVO methoare outputs of the optimization with the expectereturns, covariances, ana risk aversion coefficient useinputs.■ The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes.■ In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a higher percentage point allocation to globbon, US bon, anglobequities well a lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities.The reverse optimization methotakes the asset allocation weights its inputs thare assumeto optimal. These weights are calculatethe market capitalization weights of a globmarket portfolio. In contrast, the outputs of MVO are the asset allocation weights, whiare baseon (1) expectereturns ancovariances thare forecasteusing historicta an(2) a risk aversion coefficient. The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes. In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a 4.9, 5.5, an10.1 higher percentage point allocation to US bon, globequities, anglobbon, respectively, ana 6.1 an14.4 lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities, respectively.The asset allocation unr the two metho is follows: 考试的时候是回答各个资产的权重就行(reverse optimization这一列),还是得把变化也写上?(最后一列)

2024-08-28 18:40 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201803130100000401 问题如下 Contrast, using the information proviabove, the results of a reverse optimization approawith thof the MVO approafor eaof the following:i. The asset allocation mix. Justify your response. ■ The asset allocation weights for the reverse optimization methoare inputs into the optimization anare terminethe market capitalization weights of the globmarket portfolio.■ The asset allocation weights for the MVO methoare outputs of the optimization with the expectereturns, covariances, ana risk aversion coefficient useinputs.■ The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes.■ In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a higher percentage point allocation to globbon, US bon, anglobequities well a lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities.The reverse optimization methotakes the asset allocation weights its inputs thare assumeto optimal. These weights are calculatethe market capitalization weights of a globmarket portfolio. In contrast, the outputs of MVO are the asset allocation weights, whiare baseon (1) expectereturns ancovariances thare forecasteusing historicta an(2) a risk aversion coefficient. The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes. In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a 4.9, 5.5, an10.1 higher percentage point allocation to US bon, globequities, anglobbon, respectively, ana 6.1 an14.4 lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities, respectively.The asset allocation unr the two metho is follows: 如题

2024-08-04 01:09 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201803130100000401 问题如下 Contrast, using the information proviabove, the results of a reverse optimization approawith thof the MVO approafor eaof the following:i. The asset allocation mix. Justify your response. ■ The asset allocation weights for the reverse optimization methoare inputs into the optimization anare terminethe market capitalization weights of the globmarket portfolio.■ The asset allocation weights for the MVO methoare outputs of the optimization with the expectereturns, covariances, ana risk aversion coefficient useinputs.■ The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes.■ In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a higher percentage point allocation to globbon, US bon, anglobequities well a lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities.The reverse optimization methotakes the asset allocation weights its inputs thare assumeto optimal. These weights are calculatethe market capitalization weights of a globmarket portfolio. In contrast, the outputs of MVO are the asset allocation weights, whiare baseon (1) expectereturns ancovariances thare forecasteusing historicta an(2) a risk aversion coefficient. The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes. In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a 4.9, 5.5, an10.1 higher percentage point allocation to US bon, globequities, anglobbon, respectively, ana 6.1 an14.4 lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities, respectively.The asset allocation unr the two metho is follows: In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a higher percentage point allocation to globbon, US bon, anglobequities well a lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities.为什么呢

2024-05-02 12:54 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201803130100000401 问题如下 Contrast, using the information proviabove, the results of a reverse optimization approawith thof the MVO approafor eaof the following:i. The asset allocation mix. Justify your response. ■ The asset allocation weights for the reverse optimization methoare inputs into the optimization anare terminethe market capitalization weights of the globmarket portfolio.■ The asset allocation weights for the MVO methoare outputs of the optimization with the expectereturns, covariances, ana risk aversion coefficient useinputs.■ The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes.■ In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a higher percentage point allocation to globbon, US bon, anglobequities well a lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities.The reverse optimization methotakes the asset allocation weights its inputs thare assumeto optimal. These weights are calculatethe market capitalization weights of a globmarket portfolio. In contrast, the outputs of MVO are the asset allocation weights, whiare baseon (1) expectereturns ancovariances thare forecasteusing historicta an(2) a risk aversion coefficient. The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes. In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a 4.9, 5.5, an10.1 higher percentage point allocation to US bon, globequities, anglobbon, respectively, ana 6.1 an14.4 lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities, respectively.The asset allocation unr the two metho is follows: 第一题的第二小问为什么使用CAPM来求资产大类的impliereturn?课程中何老师是说用资产大类的市值权重来求?

2024-04-23 00:12 1 · 回答

NO.PZ201803130100000401 问题如下 Contrast, using the information proviabove, the results of a reverse optimization approawith thof the MVO approafor eaof the following:i. The asset allocation mix. Justify your response. ■ The asset allocation weights for the reverse optimization methoare inputs into the optimization anare terminethe market capitalization weights of the globmarket portfolio.■ The asset allocation weights for the MVO methoare outputs of the optimization with the expectereturns, covariances, ana risk aversion coefficient useinputs.■ The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes.■ In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a higher percentage point allocation to globbon, US bon, anglobequities well a lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities.The reverse optimization methotakes the asset allocation weights its inputs thare assumeto optimal. These weights are calculatethe market capitalization weights of a globmarket portfolio. In contrast, the outputs of MVO are the asset allocation weights, whiare baseon (1) expectereturns ancovariances thare forecasteusing historicta an(2) a risk aversion coefficient. The two metho result in significantly fferent asset allocation mixes. In contrast to MVO, the reverse optimization methoresults in a 4.9, 5.5, an10.1 higher percentage point allocation to US bon, globequities, anglobbon, respectively, ana 6.1 an14.4 lower percentage point allocation to cash anUS equities, respectively.The asset allocation unr the two metho is follows: 想问下答题到什么程度啊?看着两个主观题提问的表述很简单,拿不准或理解不到应该答哪些点,感觉答案好长

2023-10-16 15:51 1 · 回答