开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

梦阳紫依 · 2023年05月26日

股权质押without put arrangement,那相当于没有抵押物吗?

NO.PZ2021090804000011

问题如下:

Tom is a very successful entrepreneur. After six years of entrepreneurship, the technology company he founded is now worth $500 million . It is a private company. He is the controlling shareholder and owns 60% of the shares.

Since most of Tom's personal net assets are concentrated in his software company, he is rich in assets but scarce in cash. Tom met with Johnson, his private wealth adviser, for help. He indicated to Johnson that he wanted to avoid immediate taxable event for him or his company, and to maintain his ownership and control of his company. In this regard, Johnson proposed three possible strategies that Tom can use to generate liquidity from technology companies:

Strategy 1: Personal loan secured by Tom’s company’s shares without a put arrangement

Strategy 2: Leveraged recapitalization

Strategy 3: Leveraged ESOP (employee stock ownership plan)

Determine the most appropriate strategy that can generate liquidity and fulfill Tom’s wishes. Justify your response.

解释:

A personal loan secured by Tom’s company’s shares (Strategy 1) can generate liquidity and still fulfill Tom’s wishes.

The loan would allow Tom to maintain his ownership and control of the company, and since Strategy 1 does not contain the put arrangement, it has the advantage that it should not cause an immediate taxable event for the company or Tom.

Although at some point the debt will need to be repaid, Tom will have access to cash to diversify his concentration risk and will avoid triggering a taxable event. In most jurisdictions, the interest expense paid on the loan proceeds should be deductible for tax purposes. (这句话是补充说明,答案不需要有)

需注意,假如A personal loan secured by company’s shares包含一个“ put arrangement”安排,即如果不能还款,将把抵押物给贷款公司,这种安排可能会被视为应税事件(策略 1 不包含 put arrangement安排)。

Leveraged recapitalization(策略 2)不会让 Tom 保持其对公司的所有权和控制权或避免应税事件。通常,在Leveraged recapitalization下,私募股权公司将投资股权并获得业务的部分所有权。然后,私募股权公司将向高级和夹层(次级)贷方提供或安排债务。汤姆将获得一部分股票的现金,并将保留在新资本化实体中的少数股权。而且汤姆可能会被对收到的现金征税。但如果结构合理,转入新资本公司的股票将实现税收递延。 Tom 收到的税后现金收益可用于其他资产类别,以帮助建立多元化的投资组合,降低 Tom 的财富集中风险。

Leveraged ESOP (employee stock ownership plan)(ESOP,策略 3)不会满足 Tom 保持其对公司的所有权和控制权的愿望,虽然可能会让他避免应税事件。要为他的公司实施 ESOP,汤姆必须将他的部分或全部股份出售给公司创建的养老金计划。杠杆化的 ESOP 将借入资金(通常从银行)来购买 Tom 的股票。根据公司结构的法律形式,可能可以推迟对出售给 ESOP 的股票征收任何资本利得税。使用 ESOP,Tom 可以部分分散其持股并分散其整体投资组合,同时retain(而不是maintain )对公司的控制权并保持保留股份的上涨潜力。

maintain是直接保留,retain是间接保留。就比如ESOP,以前是直接对公司控制(maintain),现在是通过ESOP来间接控制公司(retain)

股东把公司股权质押给我without put arrangement,万一这股东将来还不上钱,我又不能拿走股权,那我为啥还签这个合同呢?相当于没有抵押物的借款给股东,对我有啥好处?

2 个答案

王暄_品职助教 · 2023年05月27日

嗨,爱思考的PZer你好:


我对“without put arrangement”理解还是有点不清楚。 理解一: put arrangement是如果公司还不上钱,就必须把质押的股权给我(视同销售),这样才算有保障吧? without put arrangement,我理解的意思是如果公司还不上钱,不是必须把质押的股权给我,那没保障呀?shares做抵押也没用,到时候不还钱,我啥也获得不了。 理解二 还是说不论是put arrangement还是without put arrangement,只是关于是否视同销售的问题。但无论哪种,只要股权质押,如果还不上钱,就必须把股权给我? 感觉理解一好像更符合常识一点,但不知道怎么理解,麻烦再clarify一下,谢谢~


举个栗子:我现在拿着公司股票作为抵押,去和A借500w;如果将来我换不起钱,股票直接就是A的了。但在税务局眼里,他可能会认为,你搞不好就是想通过这种方式把股票卖了换钱,还不用交税,所以这种情况事务局会视同销售。(Put arrangement)


若上述过程,当地税务局不会视同销售,就不存在put arrangement,所以是否是Put arrangement取决于当地要求(在题目里,取决于题干,比如本题,说without,那就说明上述过程并没有被认为是视同销售)

----------------------------------------------
虽然现在很辛苦,但努力过的感觉真的很好,加油!

王暄_品职助教 · 2023年05月26日

这里使用Tom’s company’s shares做抵押,借了个人贷款呀,所以出借方是有保障的

这里所说的without put arrangement是指这种行为在当地不算put arrangement

梦阳紫依 · 2023年05月27日

我对“without put arrangement”理解还是有点不清楚。 理解一: put arrangement是如果公司还不上钱,就必须把质押的股权给我(视同销售),这样才算有保障吧? without put arrangement,我理解的意思是如果公司还不上钱,不是必须把质押的股权给我,那没保障呀?shares做抵押也没用,到时候不还钱,我啥也获得不了。 理解二 还是说不论是put arrangement还是without put arrangement,只是关于是否视同销售的问题。但无论哪种,只要股权质押,如果还不上钱,就必须把股权给我? 感觉理解一好像更符合常识一点,但不知道怎么理解,麻烦再clarify一下,谢谢~

  • 2

    回答
  • 2

    关注
  • 642

    浏览
相关问题

NO.PZ2021090804000011 问题如下 Tom is a very successful entrepreneur. After six years of entrepreneurship, the technology company he founis now worth $500 million . It is a private company. He is the controlling shareholr anowns 60% of the shares. Sinmost of Tom's personnet assets are concentratein his software company, he is riin assets but scarin cash. Tom met with Johnson, his private wealth aiser, for help. He incateto Johnson thhe wanteto avoiimmeate taxable event for him or his company, anto maintain his ownership ancontrol of his company. In this regar Johnson proposethree possible strategies thTom cuse to generate liquity from technology companies:Strategy 1: PersonlosecureTom’s company’s shares without a put arrangementStrategy 2: LeveragerecapitalizationStrategy 3: LeverageESOP (employee stoownership plan)termine the most appropriate strategy thcgenerate liquity anfulfill Tom’s wishes. Justify your response. A personlosecureTom’s company’s shares (Strategy 1) cgenerate liquity anstill fulfill Tom’s wishes. The lowoulallow Tom to maintain his ownership ancontrol of the company, ansinStrategy 1 es not contain the put arrangement, it hthe aantage thit shoulnot cause immeate taxable event for the company or Tom.Although some point the will neeto repai Tom will have access to cash to versify his concentration risk anwill avoitriggering a taxable event. In most jurisctions, the interest expense paion the loprocee shoulctible for tpurposes. (这句话是补充说明,答案不需要有)需注意,假如A personlosecurecompany’s shares包含一个“ put arrangement”安排,即如果不能还款,将把抵押物给贷款公司,这种安排可能会被视为应税事件(策略 1 不包含 put arrangement安排)。Leveragerecapitalization(策略 2)不会让 Tom 保持其对公司的所有权和控制权或避免应税事件。通常,在Leveragerecapitalization下,私募股权公司将投资股权并获得业务的部分所有权。然后,私募股权公司将向高级和夹层(次级)贷方提供或安排债务。汤姆将获得一部分股票的现金,并将保留在新资本化实体中的少数股权。而且汤姆可能会被对收到的现金征税。但如果结构合理,转入新资本公司的股票将实现税收递延。 Tom 收到的税后现金收益可用于其他资产类别,以帮助建立多元化的投资组合,降低 Tom 的财富集中风险。LeverageESOP (employee stoownership plan)(ESOP,策略 3)不会满足 Tom 保持其对公司的所有权和控制权的愿望,虽然可能会让他避免应税事件。要为他的公司实施 ESOP,汤姆必须将他的部分或全部股份出售给公司创建的养老金计划。杠杆化的 ESOP 将借入资金(通常从银行)来购买 Tom 的股票。根据公司结构的法律形式,可能可以推迟对出售给 ESOP 的股票征收任何资本利得税。使用 ESOP,Tom 可以部分分散其持股并分散其整体投资组合,同时retain(而不是maintain )对公司的控制权并保持保留股份的上涨潜力。maintain是直接保留,retain是间接保留。就比如ESOP,以前是直接对公司控制(maintain),现在是通过ESOP来间接控制公司(retain) 请问这个题的答案是必须要把不包含put arrangement点出来才能得分吗?

2023-11-14 17:42 1 · 回答

NO.PZ2021090804000011 ​老师,关于可以推迟资本利得税不明。谢谢

2022-03-03 19:32 2 · 回答

NO.PZ2021090804000011 老师,这几个具体避税的方式好像讲义中都没有提到过

2022-01-11 14:01 1 · 回答