开发者:上海品职教育科技有限公司 隐私政策详情

应用版本:4.2.11(IOS)|3.2.5(安卓)APP下载

Jingwen · 2022年06月19日

关于选项B的理解

* 问题详情,请 查看题干

NO.PZ201710100100000405

问题如下:

5. If Frazee added the assumption he is considering in Fund W’s portfolio construction, it would most likely result in:

选项:

A.

a decrease in the optimal aggressiveness of the active strategy.

B.

the information ratio becoming invariant to the level of active risk.

C.

an increase in the transfer of active return forecasts into active weights.

解释:

A is correct.

The new assumption adds constraints to Fund W. The IR for a constrained portfolio generally decreases with the aggressiveness of the strategy because portfolio constraints reduce the transfer of active return forecasts into active weights. Furthermore, the optimal active risk is given by the following formula:

sigmaA=TCIRSRBσBsigma_A=TC\frac{IR}{SR_B}\sigma_B

The addition of portfolio constraints reduces the TC, thus also reducing the optimal active risk. So, having maximum over- and underweight constraints on single-country positions decreases the optimal aggressiveness of the active management strategy

考点:The full fundamental law

解析:由于constraints的引入,

A, optimal amount of active risk 的公式变为:sigmaA=TCIRSRBσBsigma_A=TC\frac{IR^\ast}{SR_B}\sigma_B,也就是增加了TC项,增加限制条件导致TC<1,因此optimal amount of active risk减小,A正确。

B,错误。没有constraints时,IR不受aggressiveness的影响;但是增加限制条件使得基金经理实现自己想法的难度增加,因此IR会减小。

C,错误,增加限制条件使得基金经理实现自己想法的难度增加,因此将预期的active return转为实际投资组合构建的程度下降,因此TC会减小。

老师,那是不是在有限制的情况下,information ratio 还是符合IR=active return/active risk,所以其实还是相关的?

而且那个时候active risk是减小的,所以IR变大?唉?那不就不对了吗?IR不是在TF小于1,那IR不是变小吗?矛盾了。

1 个答案
已采纳答案

星星_品职助教 · 2022年06月20日

同学你好,

1)IR的定义式就是active return/active risk,这点无论是否有限制都不会变化;

2)在TC=1的情况下,IR不受aggressiveness影响,此时active return和active risk会同步变化,IR值不变。

3)在TC<1的情况下,active risk增加的比分子active return更快,此时IR会随着aggressiveness的增加而减小。